Compensation Innovation: The traditional compensation playbook for engineers is outdated. New models that directly reward AI-augmented output will attract top talent and drive efficiency.
Builder/Investor Note: Founders should re-evaluate their incentive structures. Investors should seek companies experimenting with these models, as they may achieve outsized productivity.
The "So What?": The productivity gap between AI-augmented and non-AI-augmented engineers will widen. Companies that adapt their incentives will capture disproportionate value in the next 6-12 months.
Strategic Shift: Successful AI integration means identifying and solving *your* organization's specific SDLC bottlenecks, not just boosting code completion.
Builder/Investor Note: Prioritize psychological safety and invest in AI skill development. For builders, this means dedicated learning time; for investors, look for companies that do this well.
The "So What?": The next 6-12 months will separate organizations that merely *adopt* AI from those that *master* its strategic application and measurement, driving real competitive advantage.
Strategic Implication: AI integration is a company-wide transformation, not a feature. Organizations must re-architect processes, tools, and culture to compete.
Builder/Investor Note: Prioritize internal tooling that democratizes AI experimentation. Look for companies establishing "model behavior" as a distinct, cross-functional discipline.
The "So What?": The next 6-12 months will reward builders who bake AI security and user control into product design from day one, recognizing that technical mitigations alone are insufficient.
AI's real-world impact will accelerate in 2026, particularly in "conservative" professional services and fundamental sciences, despite market volatility.
Builders should focus on truly novel consumer agent experiences and niche robotics applications, while investors should eye AI IPOs with caution and consider energy efficiency plays.
The next 6-12 months will clarify the geopolitical AI race and expose the true infrastructure bottlenecks, shaping the industry's long-term trajectory.
Strategic Shift: The fintech market is moving from "digitizing everything" to "optimizing everything with AI." This means a focus on efficiency, personalization, and solving deep-seated financial problems.
Builder/Investor Note: Opportunities abound in B2B AI software for financial institutions and in consumer fintechs that prioritize "excellence" over mere access. However, the escalating AI fraud threat demands significant investment in defensive technologies.
The "So What?": Over the next 6-12 months, expect a surge in AI-powered financial products and services, but also a corresponding increase in the sophistication and volume of financial fraud. The battle for trust and security will define the winners.
Strategic Shift: The market will increasingly demand AI models evaluated on human-centric metrics, not just technical benchmarks. Companies prioritizing user experience and safety will gain a competitive edge.
Builder/Investor Note: Investigate companies developing or utilizing advanced, demographically representative human evaluation frameworks. These are crucial for building defensible, user-aligned AI products.
The "So What?": Over the next 6-12 months, expect a growing focus on AI safety, ethical alignment, and nuanced human preference data. The "Wild West" of AI evaluation is ending, paving the way for more robust, trustworthy systems.
Strategic Implication: The next frontier in AI is agentic, and progress hinges on fundamental pre-training innovation, not just post-training optimizations.
Builder/Investor Note: Focus on teams with deep experience in scaling and debugging large models, as this is a high-capital, high-risk endeavor. Builders should prioritize developing new benchmarks for agentic capabilities.
The "So What?": The industry needs to move beyond next-token prediction and static benchmarks to unlock truly capable, self-correcting AI agents in the next 6-12 months.
Shift in AI Development: The focus moves from syntax-aware code generation to execution-aware reasoning, enabling more robust and intelligent code agents.
Builder/Investor Note: Prioritize tools and platforms that support explicit execution modeling and highly asynchronous, high-throughput RL training for agentic systems.
The "So What?": AI that can simulate complex systems internally will drastically reduce development and testing costs, accelerating innovation in software and distributed systems over the next 6-12 months.
Strategic Shift: AI-driven kernel generation is not replacing human genius but augmenting it, allowing experts to focus on novel breakthroughs while AI automates the application of known optimizations across a complex hardware landscape.
Builder/Investor Note: Focus on robust validation and hardware-in-the-loop systems. Claims of "AI inventing new algorithms" in this domain are premature. The real value is in automating the "bag of tricks" for heterogeneous compute.
The "So What?": This technology is critical for scaling agentic AI workloads. Expect significant investment in tools that abstract hardware complexity and enable efficient, automated optimization, driving down the cost of AI inference in the next 6-12 months.
The commodification of AI compute, driven by decentralized networks, is shifting power from centralized data centers to globally distributed, incentive-aligned miners. This creates a more efficient, resilient, and cost-effective foundation for intelligence.
Explore building AI agents and applications on Shoots' expanding platform, leveraging their TEEs and end-to-end encryption for privacy-sensitive use cases. The "Sign in with Shoots" OAuth system offers a compelling way to integrate AI capabilities without upfront compute costs.
Shoots is not just an inference provider; it's building the foundational infrastructure for a truly decentralized, private, and intelligent internet. Over the next 6-12 months, expect to see a proliferation of sophisticated AI agents and applications built on Shoots, driven by its unique blend of incentives, security, and global compute.
The Macro Shift: Ethereum pivots from a "rollup-centric" vision to a multi-faceted approach: a powerful, ZKVM-scaled L1 coexists with a diverse "alliance" of specialized L2s. This adapts to technical realities and renews L1's core focus.
The Tactical Edge: Builders should prioritize differentiated L2 solutions or contribute to L1's ZKVM scaling. Investors should evaluate L2s based on distinct utility and symbiotic relationship with Ethereum.
The Bottom Line: Ethereum's market leadership remains, but this pivot signals a pragmatic roadmap. The next 6-12 months will see rallying around L1 ZKVM scaling and clearer L2 roles, demanding sharper focus on where value accrual and innovation occur.
Global liquidity is high, but capital is reallocating from speculative crypto to traditional stores of value and, paradoxically, to DeFi platforms offering RWA exposure. This signals a maturation where utility and transparency are gaining ground over pure hype.
Identify protocols with demonstrable revenue generation from real-world use cases, like Hyperliquid, as potential outperformers. Focus on platforms that offer transparency and accountability, as market structure shifts towards more regulated and predictable venues.
The crypto market is undergoing a structural reset, moving away from a retail-driven, speculative cycle. Investors must adapt to a landscape where fresh capital is scarce, institutional flows favor gold, and DeFi's next frontier involves real-world assets.
The convergence of AI agents and programmable money is creating a new frontier for digital commerce and liability. This shift demands a proactive re-evaluation of regulatory frameworks, moving beyond human-centric definitions of accountability and transaction.
Builders should design AI agent systems with cryptographically embedded controls, allowing for granular policy enforcement (e.g., spending limits triggering human review) and leveraging stablecoins for microtransactions in decentralized agent-to-agent economies.
The next 6-12 months will see increasing pressure to define AI agent liability and payment rails. Investors should prioritize projects building infrastructure for secure, auditable agent commerce, while builders must integrate compliance and control mechanisms from day one to navigate this evolving landscape.
The economy is shifting from human-centric labor and scarcity to AI-driven abundance, where machine intelligence itself becomes the primary unit of economic exchange, challenging traditional monetary and employment structures.
Investigate and build "proof of control" solutions using crypto primitives (like ZKPs, TEEs, decentralized compute/storage) to secure AI agents and data.
The next 6-12 months will see increased demand for verifiable control over AI systems. Understanding how crypto enables this, and how human value shifts from transactional jobs to unique human interaction, is crucial for navigating this new economic reality.
AI's productivity boom is redirecting capital from financial engineering (buybacks) in large-cap tech to physical infrastructure (data centers, hardware).
Reallocate capital from over-concentrated, buyback-dependent large-cap tech into AI infrastructure plays (hardware, energy), commodities, and potentially regional banks, while actively managing duration risk in bonds.
The market's underlying structure is cracking. Passive investment in broad tech indices will likely yield poor real returns.
