The Gwart Show
May 8, 2025

There's a reason DeFi tokens don't do well

This episode of The Gwart Show dives into why DeFi tokens often underperform, exploring the structural issues that make them a tricky bet for investors, even when their underlying projects show promise.

The Persistent Shadow of Insider Selling

  • "DeFi tokens generally have a lot of insider selling and that's like the key reason."
  • "You also have the supply overhang of insiders, VCs, teams, and whatever."
  • A critical factor suppressing DeFi token prices is the constant selling pressure from insiders, including VCs and project teams, who often hold substantial allocations.
  • This creates a "supply overhang," meaning there's a persistent flow of tokens hitting the market, which can devalue existing holdings and cap upside potential.

Riding Bitcoin's Coattails, But With Extra Baggage

  • "They just track the general market... so you're just actually buying BTC beta but you also have the supply overhang... and you also have execution risk."
  • "If BTC crashes, you also crash. You only go up if BTC goes up."
  • Many DeFi tokens essentially offer investors "BTC beta"—their prices largely mirror Bitcoin's movements. However, they come bundled with additional, uncompensated risks.
  • Beyond market correlation, investors face protocol-specific "execution risks," such as smart contract hacks (the podcast mentions Euler, which dropped 40-50% post-hack), which can decimate token value independently of broader market trends.

The Speculation Premium and Unsolved Value Accrual

  • "Maybe 80%, 70% [of token value] is just speculative premium and not on the underlying project, just on the token, right? So it's token premium."
  • "I don't think we've cracked yet how to accrue value on decentralized protocols."
  • A hefty portion (estimated at 70-80%) of many DeFi tokens' market capitalization is attributed to speculative premium, rather than the fundamental value or utility of the underlying project.
  • The link between a DeFi project's success and its token's appreciation is often tenuous because clear mechanisms for value accrual back to the token (like direct revenue streams) are frequently missing or ineffective. The industry is still grappling with this challenge.

Key Takeaways:

  • Investing in DeFi tokens often means buying into BTC's general market movements but with layers of additional, specific risks like insider selling and protocol failures, without a clear, fundamental link between project success and token value. The allure of a project being "okay" isn't enough to guarantee token appreciation due to these structural headwinds.
  • Insider Overhang: DeFi token investors face persistent selling pressure from early backers and teams.
  • BTC Beta Plus Risk: You get Bitcoin's volatility plus unique project risks, often without commensurate reward.
  • Value Accrual Mystery: DeFi hasn't solved how to reliably translate protocol success into tokenholder value.

For further insights and detailed discussions, watch the full podcast: Link

This episode dissects the persistent challenges plaguing DeFi tokens, from overwhelming insider selling pressure to the fundamental problem of value accrual, offering a sobering perspective for investors.

The Bearish Case for DeFi Tokens: Insider Selling and Market Correlation

  • The speaker initiates the discussion by pinpointing a primary concern for DeFi (Decentralized Finance) tokens—financial instruments built on blockchain that bypass traditional intermediaries: significant and ongoing insider selling.
  • This selling pressure contributes to devaluation, often causing these tokens to merely mirror broader market trends, particularly Bitcoin's performance.
  • Investors in DeFi tokens are essentially acquiring BTC beta—a measure of a token's price volatility relative to Bitcoin—but with the added downside of token-specific devaluation risks.
  • The speaker, adopting a cautious tone, suggests that this dynamic means DeFi tokens often underperform unless the entire market, led by BTC, is in a strong uptrend. For Crypto AI investors, this implies that even innovative AI-driven DeFi projects might see their token value suppressed by these market mechanics.

Speculative Premiums and Supply Overhang in DeFi

  • A substantial portion of DeFi token valuations, estimated by the speaker to be around "70% to 80%", is attributed to speculative premium rather than the intrinsic value of the underlying project.
  • This token premium exists as long as the project itself remains operational, regardless of its actual success or revenue generation.
  • Compounding this issue is the supply overhang—a large reserve of tokens held by early stakeholders—from insiders, venture capitalists (VCs), and project teams, who may continuously sell tokens into the market.
  • This creates a persistent downward price pressure, a critical consideration for researchers modeling token economies, as it can undermine even well-designed protocols.

Execution Risks and the Disconnect Between Project and Token Value

  • DeFi projects are fraught with execution risk, the danger of project failure due to technical flaws or security breaches, as exemplified by incidents like the Oiler hack, which can lead to immediate and severe token price drops (e.g., 40-50%).
  • Even if a project avoids such catastrophic events, the connection between project improvement and token value remains tenuous. The speaker highlights a critical unresolved issue: "But essentially, I don't think we've cracked yet how to accrue value on decentralized protocols."
  • This points to the challenge of value accrual, or how a token effectively captures the economic success of its platform. The lack of clear mechanisms linking project success to token holder benefits means that project success doesn't reliably translate into token appreciation.
  • For Crypto AI investors, this underscores the need to scrutinize how, or if, a DeFi protocol, especially one integrating AI, plans to channel generated value directly to its token, beyond mere speculation.

Reflective and Strategic Conclusion

The speaker's analysis reveals deep structural issues in DeFi tokenomics, primarily insider selling and flawed value accrual. Crypto AI investors and researchers should critically assess these factors, prioritizing projects with transparent and robust mechanisms for capturing protocol value, especially when AI integration promises new efficiencies.

Others You May Like