a16z
August 22, 2025

The State of AI: Growth, Fragmentation, and the Next Wave

In this deep dive, a16z partners Martin Casado and Sarah Wang dissect the AI ecosystem, revealing surprisingly rapid growth, market fragmentation, and the high-stakes investment landscape shaping the next wave of tech. Their internal analysis shows a market evolving faster than even the most bullish predictions, creating a paradox of unprecedented value creation and immense wipeout potential.

The New Hyperscalers

  • "Not only have they surpassed the early revenue ramps of some of the best SaaS companies in history, they're actually starting to pass the early ramps of some of the hyperscalers."
  • "AI-native companies are far outpacing their SaaS counterparts... blowing past this golden metric of time to 100 million of ARR."

The scale of AI’s growth isn't just incremental; it’s a categorical leap. Top-tier AI labs are scaling faster than legendary SaaS companies and even the cloud giants in their early days. This isn't just about a few winners; aggregated data shows AI-native companies are, on average, outpacing the entire SaaS 2.0 generation, driven by a 10x improvement in customer value and the ability to replace entire services budgets, not just software tools.

The Myth of the Monolith

  • "There was this view that OpenAI would win everything... but if you actually look at the history, it's been the opposite."

The early narrative that a single foundation model would dominate the entire landscape has crumbled. OpenAI had early leads in code (Copilot) and image generation (DALL-E) but lost those verticals to specialized players like Cursor and Midjourney. The key insight is that these markets are far larger and more fragmented than anticipated. What once looked like a niche is now big enough to support multiple massive companies, making "zero-sum thinking" a consistently losing investment strategy.

AI Natives and the Innovator's Dilemma

  • "Every SAS company under the sun has launched an AI product... but we're just seeing classic innovator's dilemma starting to play out already."
  • "GPT wrapper was this derogatory term... we've kind of come to the conclusion like that's not even a thing. When someone writes software on the cloud, you don't call it a cloud wrapper."

The "GPT wrapper" insult is officially dead. AI-native startups are crushing incumbents because they aren't just adding an "AI feature"; they are building entirely new products. While established SaaS players are constrained by existing revenue streams, startups are using AI to deliver tangible, jaw-dropping ROI. For instance, teams using Cursor report up to a 10x productivity lift, and Decagon customers are slashing support costs by 80% while doubling customer satisfaction.

Key Takeaways

  • The AI market is a high-stakes game where you must be on the field, but your position matters more than ever. The gap between winners and losers is widening, demanding a sharp, nuanced investment thesis.
  • Zero-Sum is a Losing Bet. The market isn't a monolith. Value is fragmenting across specialized applications in code, image, and vertical workflows. The "winner-take-all" thesis is dead.
  • Moats are Made, Not Inherent. AI’s magic solves the "bootstrap problem" of user acquisition, but long-term defensibility requires building traditional software moats like brand, workflow integration, and network effects.
  • Be on the Field, but Pick Your Spot. This is not a market to sit out, but indiscriminate investing is a death sentence. Back exceptional, proven teams, understand that conflicts can lock you out of the best deals, and never confuse market heat with genuine momentum.

For further insights and detailed discussions, watch the full podcast: Link

This episode reveals the paradox of the current AI market: while value is accruing at an unprecedented rate, the potential for catastrophic wipeouts is higher than ever, demanding a sophisticated and selective investment strategy.

The State of AI: A Paradox of Growth and Risk

  • AI companies are growing faster and reaching a larger scale than even the most bullish investors anticipated.
  • Value is accruing across every layer of the technology stack, from foundational models and infrastructure to specialized applications.
  • This explosive value creation is paired with a high potential for wipeouts, creating a high-stakes environment for investors.

Martin adds a crucial layer of nuance, arguing that "there is no AI" as a monolithic category. Instead, he views it as a collection of distinct subspaces—language models, diffusion models, applications, and tooling—each requiring a unique investment strategy, much like the broader software industry.

The Unprecedented Scale of Foundation Models

  • The early revenue ramps of top-tier AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic have not only surpassed the most successful SaaS companies in history but are also outpacing the early growth of cloud hyperscalers.
  • This growth is particularly remarkable given the short time since their products officially launched.
  • Crucially, this trend is not isolated to just two companies, indicating a broad market expansion rather than a winner-take-all scenario.

Market Fragmentation: Why Zero-Sum Thinking is Wrong

  • OpenAI, despite its pioneering role, lost its initial lead in key areas: code generation (Copilot), image generation (Midjourney), and video (Sora), even while building immense value in text-based models.
  • This fragmentation proves that markets previously considered niche are large enough to support multiple high-growth companies.
  • Martin emphasizes that avoiding a narrow, competitive mindset is critical. As he states, "Anybody that's decried of defensibility... has been wrong. Anybody that's decried like it's all going to aggregate has been wrong. So zero-sum thinking has been wrong."

The Rise of AI Applications and the Myth of the "GPT Wrapper"

  • Model Commoditization: Fierce competition among state-of-the-art models has led to continuous capability improvements and a roughly 10x year-over-year decrease in inference costs—the computational expense of running a trained AI model to generate a prediction or output.
  • Workflow Integration: Specialized AI applications are outperforming foundation models in areas with complex workflows and proprietary customer data, where deep integrations are necessary to deliver "last-mile" value.

Martin dismisses the derogatory term "GPT wrapper," arguing it misunderstands where value is created. He compares it to calling modern software a "cloud wrapper," noting that immense complexity and value exist in the software built on top of foundational infrastructure.

AI-Native Startups vs. The Innovator's Dilemma

  • AI-native companies deliver a 10x or greater improvement in customer experience and ROI, compared to the more incremental 25-50% improvements seen in the last generation of SaaS.
  • Incumbent SaaS companies, despite launching AI features, are struggling with the innovator's dilemma—a concept where established companies are hesitant to disrupt their existing, profitable products to embrace new, potentially cannibalistic technology.
  • AI-native founders are often "applied AI engineers" who excel at extracting maximum value from LLMs and translating it directly into customer benefits.

Deconstructing Defensibility in the AI Stack

  • AI effectively solves the "bootstrap problem" by using magical-seeming models to attract an initial user base. However, it does not solve the long-term retention problem.
  • To build lasting defensibility, startups must revert to traditional software moats, such as two-sided marketplaces, complex workflow integrations, or network effects.
  • Brand is also re-emerging as a powerful moat. In a crowded market, recognizable names like OpenAI or Cursor attract users, similar to how Google and Amazon dominated the early internet.

Tangible ROI: The Success of Cursor and Decagon

  • Cursor (AI-first code editor): A portfolio CTO reported a 10x productivity lift for his engineering team, with 90% of the company's code now being AI-generated. This marks a dramatic increase from the 10-15% gains reported just a year prior with tools like GitHub Copilot.
  • Decagon (AI customer support): Customers are cutting support costs by up to 80%, increasing issue deflection rates from 30% to over 60%, and doubling their customer satisfaction scores.
  • Sarah notes, "The success of these companies actually also reflects... tangible value that they're bringing their customers."

The Prosumer Flywheel and Retention Realities

  • Martin explains that new technology cycles often start with prosumers because enterprises are slower to adopt novel tools. This initial prosumer traction is now generating unprecedented enterprise sales pipelines.
  • Sarah adds a note of caution: prosumer-driven businesses often have lower retention than traditional enterprise SaaS. Investors must scrutinize whether this top-of-funnel growth converts into sticky, high-value enterprise contracts.

Navigating Wipeouts: The Art of Picking Winners

  • The trend of raising massive pre-traction funding rounds creates immense pressure for companies to transition from "telling a story" to "showing results."
  • Key lessons learned include passing on good-but-not-exceptional teams and avoiding "researcher-itis," where teams focus on research novelty over product-market fit.
  • Martin warns that investment conflicts are a major risk. "If you're too aggressive early and you don't really think through things, it can really keep you from investing in the one that's winning."

China's Role: A Mixed Blessing for the Ecosystem

  • Strengths: Chinese teams are producing excellent open-source models, benefiting from fewer copyright restrictions and cheaper data access.
  • Weaknesses: Historically, China has struggled to build and distribute enterprise or prosumer software for the global market.
  • Overall, Martin views China's contributions at the model layer as a net positive, fostering healthy competition and advancing the open-source ecosystem.

An Investor's Thesis for the Next Wave

  • State-of-the-Art Models: The strategy is to be highly selective, backing only premium, proven teams with the ability to raise massive capital and attract top talent. Martin cites their investment in Ilya Sutskever's new venture as an example.
  • Broader Market: The overarching thesis is to invest in clear market leaders with demonstrated momentum, led by visionary founders who are experts at applying AI to solve specific vertical challenges.

Conclusion

The AI market's rapid expansion and fragmentation demand a disciplined investment approach. Investors and researchers must look beyond the hype to identify companies with tangible ROI and durable moats, recognizing that in this high-stakes environment, selective betting is more critical than ever for capturing long-term value.

Others You May Like