The Gwart Show
April 28, 2025

Do VC tokens actually have value, or are they leaching off retail investors?

This analysis challenges the simplistic view that governance tokens are inherently worthless without immediate cash flow rights, arguing that markets cleverly price in future potential.

Beyond Immediate Cash Flows: Valuing Potential

  • "The common refrain is that well, these governance tokens are worthless because they don't have any right to cash flows, right? I think this is an obvious error of analysis."
  • "If a token literally has no claim on any value whatsoever, it doesn't get valued by the market."
  • The idea that tokens, particularly governance tokens, are valueless simply because they don’t currently generate fees is fundamentally flawed.
  • Markets recognize and assign value based on more than just immediate utility or cash flow; the potential for future value capture is a key factor.
  • Dismissing tokens without active fee streams ignores the option value embedded within their governance rights – the power to activate economics later.

Market Foresight: Pricing in the Fee Switch

  • "What happened, and you see it reliably when tokens turn on a fee stream, is that the token goes up like 15 to 20%... which tells you the market is not stupid."
  • "The market understands that this thing [fee stream] can be turned on."
  • Markets demonstrate foresight by anticipating the eventual activation of fee mechanisms or other economic utilities for tokens.
  • When a "fee switch" is turned on, the resulting price increase is typically modest (around 15-20%), not an astronomical leap from zero.
  • This limited jump strongly suggests the market had already priced in the possibility of future fees, acknowledging the token's latent value.

The Aave Example: Latent Value Realized

  • "Look at something like Aave. Aave for a very, very, very long time had no quote-unquote economics... Aave one day relatively recently decided that they were going to add fees, and so now the Aave token generates a fee stream."
  • Aave serves as a prime case study: its token existed for a significant period purely as a governance instrument without direct fee accrual.
  • The subsequent decision to implement fees transformed the token's economic profile, validating the latent potential it always held.
  • The market reaction to Aave activating fees aligns with the pattern: appreciation, but not an infinite jump, confirming that its pre-fee value wasn't zero.

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate around token value, especially concerning early-stage or VC-backed projects, often misses the nuance of market pricing.
  • Potential has Price: Markets value the option for a token to capture future cash flows, not just current ones. Dismissing tokens without active fees is shortsighted.
  • Fee Activation Isn't Genesis: Turning on token fees typically causes a moderate price bump (15-20%), proving the market already factored in this possibility.
  • Governance is Power: The right to govern, including the right to implement future economics, constitutes a tangible source of value recognized by the market.

For further insights and detailed discussions, watch the full podcast: Link

This episode challenges the common dismissal of governance tokens, arguing that markets intelligently price in the potential for future value capture, even before fee mechanisms are activated.

The Intrinsic Value of Tokens

The speaker opens by directly refuting the idea that tokens without immediate claims on value are worthless. They assert that the market does value these tokens, suggesting an inherent worth recognized by participants. This sets the stage for a deeper dive into how token valuation works beyond simple cash flow analysis.

Debunking the "Worthless Governance Token" Myth

A frequent criticism is that governance tokens lack value because they don't grant rights to cash flows. The speaker labels this view an “obvious error of analysis.”

  • Governance Tokens: These are digital assets primarily granting holders voting power or influence over a protocol's development, upgrades, and parameter changes.
  • The core argument against this criticism is that the potential for future changes, including implementing value capture, is often overlooked.

Case Study: Aave (AAVE) and the Fee Switch

The discussion pivots to Aave (AAVE), a major decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol, as a prime example.

  • For a long period, AAVE functioned purely as a governance token without direct "economics" or a fee stream tied to it.
  • Despite this, the token maintained significant market value, contradicting the idea that it was "useless."
  • Recently, the Aave protocol activated a fee mechanism, directing a portion of protocol revenue to token holders or the treasury, fundamentally changing its economic model. “Aave one day relatively recently decided that they were going to add fees and so now the AAVE token generates a fee stream.”

Market Reaction vs. Theoretical Valuation

The speaker analyzes the market's reaction to Aave activating its fee switch.

  • Theoretically, if the token was previously worthless (valued at zero) due to no cash flows, adding a fee stream should result in a near-infinite percentage increase in value (from zero to a positive value based on future cash flow projections).
  • However, the observed market reality was different. When Aave and similar tokens "turn on a fee switch," the price typically increases by only 15-20%.

Market Foresight and Implied Value

This relatively modest price increase reveals a crucial insight: “the market is not stupid.”

  • Investors and the market collectively understood that the option to turn on fees for AAVE always existed via governance.
  • This potential was already factored into the token's price before the fee switch was activated.
  • The 15-20% bump reflects the removal of uncertainty and the confirmation of value capture, rather than the creation of value from nothing.
  • The speaker concludes that the notion of a token being valueless simply because it currently lacks a fee stream is “nonsensical,” as the market prices in the governance power to implement such features later.

Conclusion

The episode underscores that token valuation, particularly for governance tokens, incorporates future potential and the power of community decisions. Investors and researchers should assess tokens not just on current utility but on the embedded option for future value capture mechanisms activated via governance.

Others You May Like