The People's AI
April 17, 2025

Bryan Pellegrino on Building the Crypto Rails for AI Agents

Layer Zero CEO Bryan Pellegrino, drawing on a wild background spanning professional poker, AI research with Noam Brown, and early Bitcoin adoption, maps out the critical infrastructure needed as AI agents increasingly interact with blockchains.

1. From Poker Probabilities to AI & Crypto Rails

  • "Poker influences your ability to think probabilistically... foundational to being able to understand how [AI] systems work."
  • "I had just seen the Atari agent demo by DeepMind... that really was like the first thing that really made a huge impression on me... of just the power of reinforcement learning."
  • Pellegrino's journey highlights how probabilistic thinking honed in high-stakes poker provided a unique lens for understanding AI and the inherent uncertainties in both AI models and crypto markets.
  • His early foray into AI, sparked by DeepMind and leading to collaborations with figures like Billy Beane and Noam Brown (co-publishing research on CFRD+), established deep technical roots before founding Layer Zero.
  • The practical need for payment solutions after US online poker bans led him to Bitcoin early on, intertwining his path with crypto's evolution from the start.

2. Layer Zero: The TCP/IP for Blockchains

  • "Everything was a special case of general messaging... the way we designed layer zero was really just that... invoke a contract here. Create an array of bytes. Move the bytes. Invoke a contract on the other chain."
  • Layer Zero is designed as a universal messaging layer, akin to the internet's TCP/IP, enabling communication between disparate blockchain environments rather than just bridging assets.
  • It functions by passing generic byte packets, allowing arbitrary contract invocations across chains, abstracting the complexity for developers and, increasingly, AI agents.
  • This generalizable approach underpins its significant market traction (~75% market share, supporting $240B+ in asset issuance).

3. AI Agents Need Crypto's Payment Pipes

  • "Crypto is incredibly good at both [micropayments and fast remittance]... I think crypto is like *the* solution there... It's done. it's easy, it's there."
  • "Money within Layer Zero becomes completely fungible across environments... that is like the tool that agents use... at a higher rate and velocity than any human ever could."
  • Pellegrino sees crypto's clearest near-term role for AI as providing efficient, global payment rails, essential for agents performing micro-transactions or settling tasks across borders.
  • Layer Zero aims to be these rails, making assets fungible across chains and allowing agents to transact seamlessly without needing deep knowledge of underlying chain mechanics or holding diverse inventories.
  • While agents need secure wallets, the core challenge lies in reputation systems, as agents (like anonymous addresses) can be created cheaply, necessitating performance history and trust mechanisms.

4. Pragmatism on AI's Future & Decentralization

  • "We just need... a set of guardrails by just defining invariants... very simple sanity checks, invariants will solve a lot [of hallucination risk]."
  • "I think progress is going to be slower to AGI and ASI than people think it is... but the net utility will be embedded in every piece of the fabric of society within a decade."
  • Addressing AI hallucination risk with irreversible blockchains requires guardrails and invariants (like Layer Zero's "pre-crime" checks) to ensure transactions meet predefined safety criteria.
  • Pellegrino remains skeptical of decentralized compute/storage due to unfavorable economics (electricity costs) but is bullish on crypto for payments and potentially user data ownership, despite adoption hurdles.
  • He predicts AI agent operations will soon vastly outnumber human ones, driving huge demand for compute, energy, and settlement infrastructure, even if AGI/ASI remains distant.

Key Takeaways:

  • The intersection of AI and crypto is rapidly evolving, demanding robust, flexible infrastructure. Pellegrino highlights the inevitable rise of AI agent activity and crypto's crucial role as the financial plumbing.
  • Agent Volume Tsunami: AI agents will perform vastly more blockchain operations (especially payments) than humans very soon, demanding scalable infrastructure.
  • Crypto is the Payment Layer: Forget decentralized compute (for now); crypto's killer app for AI is providing seamless, low-cost global payment rails.
  • Build Generalizable Rails: Success requires building adaptable, fundamental infrastructure (like Layer Zero aims to be) rather than solving fleeting, specific problems in this fast-changing landscape.

For further insights and detailed discussions, watch the full podcast: Link

This episode unpacks Bryan Pellegrino's unique path from pro poker player to AI researcher, revealing how Layer Zero is building the critical crypto infrastructure for autonomous AI agents and cross-chain communication.

Bryan Pellegrino's Journey: From Poker Pro to AI Researcher

  • Bryan Pellegrino, CEO of Layer Zero, details his unconventional background, starting as a computer science dropout who became a top professional poker player. The US ban on online poker prompted a career shift. Inspired by DeepMind's Atari agent demo demonstrating Reinforcement Learning (RL)—a type of machine learning where agents learn by receiving rewards or penalties for actions—Bryan began building AI models. This led him to collaborate with Billy Beane (of Moneyball fame) on baseball analytics models and later with AI researcher Gnome Brown (also from a poker background) at Facebook AI Research (now FAIR).
  • Bryan and his co-founder developed CFRD+, a counterfactual regret minimization algorithm significantly outperforming existing methods for solving imperfect information games like poker.
  • Their work was published and cited by DeepMind, bringing Bryan's journey full circle.
  • Bryan notes his early captivation with RL, viewing it as "complete magic," but also expresses caution about industry hype cycles, particularly the over-extrapolation of progress after initial breakthroughs like deep learning's application with massive compute and data. He emphasizes the need for continued foundational research beyond just scaling resources.

The Accidental Bitcoin Millionaires: Crypto's Poker Origins

  • Bryan explains a fascinating, often overlooked connection: the 2011 US online poker ban inadvertently pushed many professional players towards Bitcoin. With traditional payment processors blocked, Bitcoin became the primary means for players to deposit funds onto remaining international sites and transact amongst themselves.
  • This forced adoption created an early cohort of Bitcoin users and holders within the poker community. Bryan humorously notes, "There is an article or book someone used to write about the kind of accidental Bitcoin millionaires/billionaires from poker players."
  • Bryan himself was drawn to Bitcoin early on, initially attracted by its permissionless nature after his poker career was disrupted.

The Genesis of Layer Zero: Solving Cross-Chain Communication

  • Bryan describes his parallel interest in crypto alongside AI. While initially focused on Bitcoin, the advent of smart contracts on platforms like Ethereum revealed new potential. The proliferation of chains like Binance Smart Chain, challenging Ethereum's dominance, highlighted a critical problem: the lack of seamless communication between these distinct blockchain environments.
  • Bryan and his co-founders encountered this directly when building a cross-chain game. They realized existing solutions required centralized coordinators, defeating the purpose of decentralization.
  • This challenge led them down the path to conceptualizing Layer Zero, aiming to solve the general problem of interoperability between disparate blockchain execution environments.

Layer Zero Explained: Beyond Bridging to General Messaging

  • Layer Zero is presented not merely as a "bridge" for transferring assets (which often involves locking assets and minting derivatives, creating persistent risk), but as a fundamental, generalized messaging protocol akin to the internet's TCP/IP.
  • Bryan draws an analogy to the pre-internet era where data had to be physically moved between computer clusters (like DARPA and Stanford). Layer Zero provides the communication fabric.
  • Technically, it allows a smart contract on one chain to invoke a contract on another by sending a generic payload (an array of bytes). The protocol is agnostic to the message content, whether it's a financial transaction or a game state update.
  • Bryan states, "Everything is just a generic packet to us." This approach has resonated, with Layer Zero supporting issuers of ~$240 billion in assets and securing significant market share.

AI Agents Meet Blockchains: The Layer Zero Intersection

  • Bryan initially harbored skepticism about some Crypto x AI intersections, particularly decentralized compute (due to electricity cost disparities) and on-chain data storage (due to inefficiency). However, he developed strong conviction around the need for crypto payment rails for AI agents.
  • AI Agents: Software entities capable of autonomous action to achieve goals.
  • He argues that agents performing tasks will need to transact, often via micropayments, which traditional finance handles poorly. Crypto offers a native solution.
  • He contrasts this with a potential future where a centralized entity like OpenAI controls agent interactions and payments, arguing the crypto approach aligns better with user data ownership and privacy.
  • Layer Zero provides the abstraction layer needed for agents (like those using Wayfinder, mentioned as an example) to operate across multiple chains without needing deep knowledge of each environment, facilitating seamless asset movement to fulfill user objectives (e.g., finding the best yield across different blockchains).

The Inevitability of Agent-Driven Volume

  • Bryan expresses high confidence that AI agents will eventually drive the majority of blockchain transaction volume, far exceeding human activity. He cites the leverage agents provide, their 24/7 operational capacity, and their ability to process information and execute tasks at scale.
  • Using a personal anecdote about using AI for deep research during a family trip, he illustrates the rapidly growing capabilities and efficiency of AI.
  • He sees it as a "very obvious eventuality... that agents themselves performing more operations... far more than what the subset of humans does right now." This implies a massive increase in demand for the underlying infrastructure Layer Zero provides.

Layer Zero's Role: Facilitating Agent Interactions

  • Layer Zero's primary role in the AI agent economy is providing the infrastructure for seamless, fungible asset movement and payments across diverse blockchain environments. It acts as the universal translator and transport layer for value.
  • Bryan clarifies Layer Zero is the tool agents use for payments and settlement, rather than the environment where the agents themselves necessarily reside or execute their core logic.
  • He also mentions Layer Zero Read, a component enabling off-chain systems (like LLMs) to interact with on-chain data or trigger on-chain actions based on consensus, further bridging the gap.

Addressing AI Hallucination on Immutable Ledgers

  • The conversation tackles the critical challenge of AI agents potentially "hallucinating" (generating incorrect or nonsensical outputs) and executing irreversible transactions on blockchains. Bryan suggests practical solutions focused on guardrails and verification.
  • While acknowledging ZK (Zero-Knowledge) proofs—cryptographic methods allowing verification without revealing underlying data—as potentially interesting, he emphasizes the immediate utility of defining Invariants: fundamental rules or conditions that must hold true for a transaction to be considered valid.
  • Layer Zero employs a system ("pre-crime") that simulates a transaction locally before execution, checking the outcome against application-defined invariants (e.g., solvency checks for a bridge, payment amount limits for an agent). If an invariant is violated, the transaction is blocked, preventing errors or malicious actions stemming from agent mistakes.

AI Agents as On-Chain Actors: Wallets, Identity, and Cross-Chain Reality

  • Key considerations include:
    • Wallets: Agents need secure ways to hold assets and sign transactions. Bryan suggests this involves enhancing security around existing wallet infrastructure rather than entirely new protocols.
    • Reputation: With the low cost of creating agents, establishing reputation becomes crucial. This likely involves tracking performance history and reliability, similar to how smart contracts gain trust through battle-testing over time. This helps mitigate risks like Sybil Attacks, where one entity creates many fake identities.
    • Agent Location: Bryan firmly believes agents will use blockchains as tools (especially for payments and data integrity) but won't live exclusively on-chain. They need to interact with off-chain data and systems (like the internet, APIs) to perform most useful tasks. Limiting them to a single chain is impractical.

Underrated Crypto AI Use Cases: Beyond Payments

  • While payments are the clearest use case, Bryan highlights other potential areas:
    • Cryptographic Watermarking: Using cryptography to securely prove the origin or authenticity of data created by AI agents, crucial in an era of generated content.
    • User Data Ownership: While acknowledging the difficulty of disrupting existing data monopolies, Bryan sees immense asymmetric potential in models (like Vanna's) that empower users to control and potentially monetize their data for AI training.
    • Unstoppable Agents: The concept of agents deployed on-chain (perhaps as DAOs) that operate autonomously and resist censorship, potentially managing assets or performing tasks in decentralized financial markets.

Building for an Uncertain Future: The Power of Generalizability

  • Given the rapid evolution of AI, Bryan emphasizes Layer Zero's strategy of building generalizable infrastructure rather than solving narrow, immediate problems.
  • By focusing on the fundamental primitive of cross-chain messaging, Layer Zero aims to be useful regardless of how the multi-chain landscape or AI agent capabilities evolve.
  • "You have to think about what is the generalizable problem. How do I build the thing of the highest possible utility..." This approach provides resilience against obsolescence.

Future Outlook: Predictions for AI and Crypto

  • Bryan offers a grounded but optimistic 5-10 year outlook:
    • Slower AGI/ASI: Progress towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or Superintelligence (ASI) will likely be slower than hype suggests, requiring more foundational research breakthroughs.
    • Agent Proliferation: Expect a massive increase in specialized agents performing tasks across various domains, driving huge transaction volumes.
    • Robotics Skepticism: He is less convinced about rapid progress in fine motor skill robotics compared to software agents.
    • Energy Demand: A clear consequence will be significantly increased demand for compute and energy.
    • High Net Utility: Despite slower AGI, AI will become deeply embedded in the fabric of society, delivering immense practical value within the next decade.

Conclusion

This episode highlights Layer Zero's strategic positioning as essential infrastructure for the burgeoning AI agent economy, focusing on generalized cross-chain communication, particularly for payments. Investors and researchers should closely monitor agent adoption rates and cross-chain transaction patterns as key indicators of Crypto AI integration and Layer Zero's pivotal role.

Others You May Like