The Gwart Show
April 25, 2025

Are Ethereum stakers getting screwed?

This episode dives past the headline debate on Ethereum's net inflation, exploring the crucial difference between the network's overall state and the actual economic reality for those staking ETH.

Net Inflation vs. Staker Reality

  • "You're pointing out that net Ethereum inflation is above zero... Right now, it's inflationary very mildly."
  • "The relevant question is if you're an Ethereum staker, what is the real inflation rate for you?... for Ethereum, if you're staking Ethereum right now, you're actually you're actually deflating."
  • While Ethereum's net supply issuance is currently slightly positive (mildly inflationary), this isn't the most critical metric for token holders.
  • The key question is the "real inflation rate" for stakers, considering their rewards. For ETH stakers, the dynamics mean their holdings are effectively deflating relative to the total supply – their share of the network is growing.

The Great ETH Transfer

  • "What's happening is that there's a net transfer that's happening from non-stakers to stakers, right? Stakers are owning more and more a percentage of the network over time."
  • "And that net transfer is the actual economic value."
  • A fundamental economic shift is occurring within Ethereum: value continuously flows from passive ETH holders (non-stakers) to active participants (stakers).
  • Stakers gain a progressively larger percentage of the total ETH supply over time, representing the core economic incentive and value capture of holding staked ETH. Non-stakers are effectively being diluted relative to stakers.

Solana Counterpoint

  • "For Solana, if you stake Solana... Solana is inflating relative to the staking rate, right? You're still getting inflated away even if you're staking Soul."
  • Unlike Ethereum's current situation, Solana stakers face inflation relative to the staking rate, according to the speaker's belief.
  • Even when staking SOL, holders might see their proportional ownership decrease due to significant ongoing supply issuance, highlighting different tokenomic designs and outcomes.

Key Takeaways:

  • Focusing solely on Ethereum's net inflation misses the crucial point for holders. The real story lies in the economic benefits accruing specifically to stakers.
  • ETH Stakers Win: Despite mild network inflation, ETH stakers benefit from a net deflationary effect, increasing their network ownership over time.
  • Stake or Dilute: Holding ETH without staking means passively transferring economic value to those who do stake.
  • Not All Staking is Equal: Different blockchains have vastly different inflation dynamics for stakers (e.g., Ethereum vs. Solana).

For further insights, watch the podcast here: Link

This episode dissects the true economic reality for Ethereum stakers, revealing how their effective inflation rate differs significantly from the network's overall rate.

Understanding Real Inflation for Ethereum Stakers

  • The speaker challenges the focus on Ethereum's net inflation rate (currently slightly above zero after a brief post-Merge deflationary period).
  • The critical question, according to the speaker, is the real inflation or deflation experienced by those actively participating in staking – the process of locking up ETH to help secure the network and earning rewards in return.
  • Holding ETH grants the right, but not the obligation, to stake. Choosing not to stake is akin to foregoing dividends on a stock.
  • For Ethereum stakers currently, the effective rate is deflationary. This means their holdings are increasing relative to the total supply faster than new ETH is created, effectively increasing their proportional ownership of the network.

Value Transfer Dynamics: Stakers vs. Non-Stakers

  • The speaker highlights a continuous net transfer of economic value occurring from non-staking ETH holders to those who are staking.
  • "Stakers are owning more and more a percentage of the network over time," the speaker notes, emphasizing that this transfer constitutes the core economic value proposition for active participants.
  • An analogy is drawn to yield-bearing assets like Athena, where the value primarily accrues to those actively capturing the yield, rendering non-participants "economically irrelevant" to that specific value capture mechanism.
  • The speaker contrasts this with Solana (acknowledging potential inaccuracy), suggesting that even staked SOL might currently experience inflation relative to the staking rewards due to significant ongoing supply issuance.

Strategic Implications for Investors

  • The analysis underscores that for ETH holders, simply holding the asset without staking results in gradual dilution relative to active stakers.
  • The real economic value for an investor participating in the ecosystem is tied to the inflation/deflation dynamics experienced as a staker.
  • Crypto AI investors and researchers should analyze tokenomics not just at the network level (overall inflation/deflation) but specifically from the perspective of active participation (staking) to understand true value accrual and potential dilution risks.

Conclusion

This discussion reveals that Ethereum stakers currently benefit from a deflationary environment relative to their holdings, capturing value transferred from non-stakers. Investors must assess tokenomics from the staker's perspective to grasp the true economic incentives and avoid dilution.

Others You May Like