Forward Guidance
April 9, 2025

The Most Important Chart In Macro | Darius Dale

Darius Dale of 42 Macro unveils what he deems the "most important chart in macro," highlighting the stark divergence between labor's falling share of national income and capital's record-high share, framing it as the central driver for a potential Trump-led economic reordering.

The Great Imbalance: Labor vs. Capital

  • "This chart shows labor share of national income... down here at 51 and a half percent... relative to capital share of national income as noted by corporate profits... all the way up at an all-time high of 14%."
  • "I've been calling out this toxic imbalance since I first created this chart..."
  • The core issue is the widening gap: Labor's share of national income has dwindled while corporate profits (capital's share) reach historic highs.
  • Dale identifies this trend as a "toxic imbalance" that has persisted and worsened, despite a brief narrowing during Trump's first term.
  • This chart visually encapsulates the economic tension fueling potential policy shifts aimed at reversing this decades-long trend.

Trump's Mandate: Reversing Globalization's Toll

  • "He's shaking hands with all the people that were left behind by globalization. And ultimately he believes that he dodged an assassin's bullet to fix it..."
  • "He thinks he was spared by God to correct this toxic imbalance."
  • Trump's political approach is deeply influenced by his interactions with communities feeling economically abandoned due to globalization.
  • Dale suggests Trump views correcting this imbalance not just as policy, but as a near-messianic mission.
  • The goal is to elevate the median American, recognizing that gains concentrated at the top (skewing the mean) haven't benefited the broader population.

The Paradigm Shift: Wall Street Loses, Labor Wins?

  • "In order for the median American to win, the people who've had all the income and wealth concentrated at the top need to lose the game."
  • "Wall Street, which has benefited from globalization as much as anybody... Wall Street's a loser in this paradigm shift."
  • A potential second Trump administration would likely initiate a significant economic paradigm shift, prioritizing labor over capital.
  • This implies policies designed to compress the gap shown in the chart, meaning gains for labor would likely come at the expense of capital (corporate profits, asset values).
  • Wall Street and wealthy asset owners (noting the top quintile owns ~88% of financial assets) are identified as the primary "losers" in this proposed economic rebalancing act.

Tariffs and the Rocky Road Ahead

  • "It's our view that the tariffs... They're going to have to wave the white flag and say 'no mas' and drop all of their tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade."
  • Tariffs are positioned as the key weapon to force concessions from global trading partners, compelling them to lower their own barriers.
  • This process is expected to be lengthy and contentious, potentially requiring significant economic pain globally.
  • Dale anticipates that forcing capitulation, particularly from nations like China, might necessitate a global recession.

Key Takeaways:

  • The central thesis revolves around correcting the perceived "toxic imbalance" between labor and capital income shares. This potential shift, driven by a Trump administration, explicitly aims to benefit the median worker at the expense of capital owners and Wall Street. Investors should brace for potentially disruptive trade policies and the possibility of significant economic friction, including a recession, as part of this rebalancing effort.
  • Economic Reordering Imminent: A potential Trump presidency signals a deliberate shift away from globalization, aiming to boost labor's income share potentially at the direct cost of corporate profits and asset values.
  • Wall Street & Capital Under Pressure: The biggest beneficiaries of the past paradigm (Wall Street, asset owners) are explicitly targeted to "lose the game" for the median worker to gain ground.
  • Recession Risk Elevated: Forcing global trade rebalancing via tariffs is expected to be conflict-ridden and could trigger a global recession before trading partners capitulate.

Podcast Link: Link

This episode unpacks Darius Dale's analysis of a potential seismic economic paradigm shift, driven by the stark imbalance between labor and capital, signaling profound implications for global markets and risk assets relevant to Crypto AI investors.

The Central Economic Imbalance: Labor vs. Capital

  • Darius Dale introduces what he considers the "most important chart in macro," illustrating a critical divergence in the US economy.
  • The chart starkly contrasts the Labor Share of National Income (compensation of employees as a percentage of national income), currently near historic lows at 51.5%, with the Capital Share of National Income (represented by corporate profits as a share of Gross Domestic Income), which sits at an all-time high of 14%.
  • Dale argues this widening gap represents a "toxic imbalance" that has developed over decades, largely driven by globalization trends that have disproportionately benefited capital owners.
  • He notes this imbalance has worsened significantly, despite a brief narrowing during the previous Trump term, highlighting the persistence of forces favoring capital concentration.

Political Catalyst: Trump's Perceived Mandate for Change

  • Dale posits that former President Trump's extensive engagement with communities negatively impacted by globalization has solidified a resolve to fundamentally alter this economic structure.
  • Having witnessed firsthand the economic hardship and social issues in areas left behind, Trump perceives a mandate, almost a divine calling, to correct the imbalance. Dale observes, "...he believes that he dodged an assassin bullet to fix it right... he thinks he was spared by God to correct this toxic imbalance."
  • This perspective suggests a potential administration would prioritize policies aimed at reversing the decades-long trend of declining labor share, viewing it as essential for national renewal.
  • For investors and researchers, this signals a high degree of political risk and the potential for policy shifts explicitly designed to rebalance economic outcomes away from capital concentration.

The Proposed Correction: Reversing Globalization's Tide

  • The core thesis presented by Dale is that achieving a "golden age" for the median American necessitates a relative decline for those at the top who have benefited most from globalization.
  • This implies policies designed to redistribute economic gains, potentially through mechanisms like tariffs and forcing trade partners to dismantle their own barriers. Globalization, in this context, refers to the increasing interconnectedness of world economies, often involving outsourcing manufacturing and services to lower-cost regions, which historically boosted corporate profits but sometimes depressed domestic wages.
  • Dale explicitly identifies Wall Street and the wealthiest asset owners (noting the top quintile owns ~88% of financial assets) as the groups likely to face headwinds in this scenario, as their gains have been closely tied to the existing globalized structure.
  • Crypto AI investors should note this potential shift away from prioritizing capital efficiency (a hallmark of globalization) towards prioritizing domestic labor share could alter investment landscapes, potentially impacting corporate profitability and traditional asset valuations.

Implementation Challenges and Global Recession Risk

  • Dale anticipates that enacting this shift will be a prolonged and potentially disruptive process, unlikely to occur without significant global friction.
  • He suggests that forcing other countries, particularly resistant ones like China, to lower trade barriers and accept new terms will require substantial leverage, potentially necessitating a global recession to compel capitulation.
  • The proposed tariffs might be negotiation tools, but the underlying goal is a fundamental restructuring of trade relationships, which won't happen quickly or easily.
  • For the Crypto AI space, this outlook underscores a period of heightened macroeconomic uncertainty and potential volatility. A global recession or significant trade disruptions could impact everything from venture funding availability to the supply chains for critical AI hardware (like GPUs), demanding careful risk management.

Conclusion: Monitoring the Macro Shift

  • Darius Dale's analysis points to a potential major economic rebalancing aimed at boosting labor's share of income at the expense of capital's historically high share.
  • Crypto AI investors and researchers must monitor this potential macro paradigm shift closely, as it carries significant implications for risk asset valuations, global capital flows, and geopolitical stability impacting technology sectors.

Others You May Like