Weights & Biases
December 16, 2025

Build reliable AI agents using W&B Training

The path to reliable AI agents often hits a wall: advanced fine-tuning with Reinforcement Learning (RL) is powerful but notoriously complex and resource-intensive. This episode cuts through that, showing how Weights & Biases (W&B) Serverless RL, powered by Coreweave, makes this critical technique accessible, allowing builders to elevate AI agent performance without the usual headaches.

RL's New Accessibility

  • “Until recently, the barriers to conducting reinforcement learning were significant. First, researching and comparing GPU providers to find the best fit demands time and expert resources. Second, developing effective RL scripts requires skilled developers with a fair amount of time on their hands.”
  • The Infrastructure Barrier Falls: W&B Serverless RL provides instant, elastic access to Coreweave GPUs. Think of it like moving from owning and maintaining your own power plant to simply plugging into the grid – you get compute on demand without the overhead.
  • Simplified Scripting: The platform integrates ART (Agent Reinforcement Trainer), an open-source framework for LLM learning from experience, and Ruler, a universal verifier for RL rewards.
  • Automated Rewards: Ruler eliminates the need for manual reward function crafting, label data, or expert feedback. It uses an LLM-as-a-judge to rank agent trajectories, streamlining a historically difficult part of RL.

Precision Tuning for Agentic AI

  • “Whereas supervised fine-tuning is ideal for improving instruction following, formatting, and domain grounding, reinforcement learning excels when optimizing for user preferences or complex outcome focused goals.”
  • Beyond Basic Fine-tuning: Supervised fine-tuning improves instruction adherence. RL, by contrast, optimizes LLMs for complex, user-centric outcomes and preferences, crucial for agents that need to learn from interactions.
  • Reliability is Key: RL is becoming the standard for enhancing AI application reliability, correcting specific errors identified in QA or production, and building confidence before deployment.
  • Complex Goal Alignment: RL helps align LLM behavior with nuanced goals like cost optimization, positive customer experience, and appropriate human escalation in critical scenarios.

Open-Source Models Punch Up

  • “Our goal in this exercise is to use RL post training to bring our open-source model up to par with these much more expensive and to some extent less flexible proprietary models.”
  • Real-World Impact: The podcast demonstrates RL fine-tuning on a multi-agent contact center, improving critical routing decisions (e.g., identifying fraudulent transactions for human escalation).
  • Performance Parity: RL fine-tuning can significantly boost the behavioral metrics of open-source LLMs (like Qwen 3 14B Instruct) to rival or exceed proprietary models (Sonnet 4, Gemini, GPT) in specific tasks.
  • Cost-Performance Advantage: A fine-tuned Qwen model achieved comparable routing accuracy to proprietary models while maintaining superior latency and cost efficiency, proving open-source viability for production.

Key Takeaways:

  • The democratization of RL fine-tuning will accelerate the development and deployment of more reliable and sophisticated AI agents across industries.
  • Builders should explore open-source LLMs combined with RL fine-tuning as a cost-effective strategy to achieve specific performance benchmarks, especially where latency and cost are critical.
  • Platforms abstracting infrastructure complexity and providing integrated tooling for the entire AI development lifecycle are crucial for the next phase of AI agent deployment.

Podcast Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4Yn00MBaeI

Weights & Biases shatters the barriers to advanced reinforcement learning, empowering developers to build reliable AI agents without prohibitive costs or deep expertise.

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The RL Imperative for Agent Reliability

  • Traditional LLM tuning methods hit a ceiling, limiting AI application performance. Russ from Weights and Biases argues that while initial gains come from prompt engineering, RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation – an AI framework that retrieves facts from an external knowledge base to ground LLM responses, reducing hallucinations), and LLM swapping, these techniques quickly plateau.
  • Accuracy, latency, cost, and safety are critical metrics for AI applications, indicating production readiness.
  • Supervised fine-tuning improves instruction following and domain grounding.
  • Reinforcement Learning (RL – a machine learning paradigm where an agent learns to make decisions by performing actions in an environment to maximize a cumulative reward) fine-tunes LLMs for agentic tasks, optimizing user preferences and complex outcome-focused goals.
  • RL corrects specific production errors and builds confidence for deployment.
  • “Reinforcement learning excels when optimizing for user preferences or complex outcome focused goals.”

Democratizing RL: W&B's Serverless Solution

  • RL was historically inaccessible due to significant GPU and expertise demands. Russ highlights that previous RL implementation required weeks of effort for GPU provisioning and complex script development.
  • W&B Training Serverless RL provides instant access to Coreweave GPU capacity with elastic scaling and no provisioning.
  • It integrates ART (Agent Reinforcement Trainer), an open-source RL framework that improves agent reliability by allowing LLMs to learn from experience.
  • Ruler, an open-source universal verifier for RL rewards, eliminates the need for manual reward function crafting.
  • Built-in observability monitors and debugs training runs.
  • “W&B training serverless RL... lets you start experimenting with RL and improving AI application performance immediately.”

Real-World Agent Reliability: The Contact Center Use Case

  • Russ demonstrates Serverless RL with a multi-agent contact center for a consumer bank. This system routes credit card customers, but critical scenarios demand human agent escalation.
  • The contact center optimizes for cost, customer experience, and common support questions using prompt engineering and RAG.
  • High-risk, high-value scenarios (disputing transactions, account closure, fraud) require accurate routing to human agents.
  • The planner agent must precisely route customers to the correct human department, ensuring both customer experience and bank productivity.
  • “For these higher risk and higher value scenarios, we need our multi-agent contact center to route customers to a human agent in the right department.”

Fine-Tuning Qwen: Bridging the Performance Gap

  • Initial LLM evaluations revealed trade-offs between performance, latency, and cost. Russ details the process of applying RL to an open-source model.
  • Evaluations compared Sonnet 4, Gemini 2.5 Flash, OpenAI GPT models, and Qwen 3 14B Instruct.
  • Sonnet 4 showed high latency/cost but superior routing; Gemini was faster/cheaper but less accurate. Qwen offered low latency/cost but lower behavioral performance.
  • The goal: Improve Qwen's behavioral metrics (routing, human escalation) using RL fine-tuning while retaining its cost and latency advantages.
  • The RL workflow involves setting up an environment (e.g., Enron email dataset), defining a trainable model (Qwen), and establishing correctness metrics.
  • “This is the perfect use case for RL fine-tuning. Let's see if we can improve our behavioral metrics using Qued while keeping latency and cost low.”

ART & Ruler: Streamlining the RL Loop

  • The integration of ART and Ruler simplifies the complex RL process. Russ explains how these tools abstract away significant development challenges.
  • ART (Agent Reinforcement Trainer) uses Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO – an RL algorithm used for policy optimization) for LLM reinforcement learning.
  • Ruler acts as a general-purpose reward function, analyzing agent prompts to generate an "LLM as a judge" for ranking multiple agent trajectories.
  • Ruler eliminates the need for labeled data, expert feedback, or handcrafted reward functions.
  • The ART client manages communication and data gathering, while the Coreweave-powered backend handles inference and training.
  • Trained LoRAs (low-rank adapters – a parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique that adapts pre-trained models by injecting small, trainable matrices into existing layers) are automatically stored as W&B artifacts for hosting.
  • “Ruler requires no label data, expert feedback, or handcrafted reward functions.”

Iteration & Validation: Achieving Production Readiness

  • Tracking progress and iteratively evaluating fine-tuned models is crucial for production deployment. Russ outlines the W&B platform's role in this process.
  • W&B Models tracks fine-tuning, and W&B Weave observes rollouts.
  • Key metrics include `route_correct`, `send_to_human_correct`, and `ruler_score`.
  • Iterative evaluation involves running RL, recording metrics, and submitting trained LoRAs for further testing.
  • RL fine-tuning significantly improved Qwen's `route_score` and `send_to_human_score`, matching or exceeding proprietary models on critical metrics.
  • The fine-tuned Qwen model maintained latency and cost advantages, making it production-ready.
  • “Our goal in this exercise is to use RL post training to bring our open-source model up to par with these much more expensive and to some extent less flexible proprietary models.”

Investor & Researcher Alpha

  • Capital Movement: Investment shifts towards platforms that abstract away the infrastructure complexities of advanced machine learning, particularly reinforcement learning. Solutions offering serverless GPU access and integrated MLOps for RL will capture significant market share.
  • New Bottleneck: The primary bottleneck for AI agent development is no longer initial GPU access but the ability to rapidly iterate, evaluate, and debug complex RL models in production environments.
  • Research Direction: Focus on developing robust, generalizable, and automated reward functions (like Ruler) will accelerate RL adoption and reduce the need for specialized human expertise in reward engineering.

Strategic Conclusion

W&B's Serverless RL, ART, and Ruler democratize advanced LLM fine-tuning, making reliable AI agent development accessible and efficient. The industry must prioritize accessible, observable RL platforms to accelerate reliable AI agent deployment.

Others You May Like