Unchained
July 16, 2025

Bitcoin Moons, Can Banks Win Stablecoins & Will ICOs Boom? Bits + Bips

This week, the Bits and Bips crew, joined by Austin Campbell, a fixed-income veteran and crypto regulation expert, dissects Bitcoin's blistering rally. They debate whether big banks are poised to dominate the stablecoin race and question if the latest ICO craze signals a new dawn or just financial nihilism.

Bitcoin: The Global Safe Haven

  • “Bitcoin is one of the very few assets that fulfills two key criteria here. One, it is both a risk asset and a safe haven... And two, it is one of the very few liquid assets traded today that is global.”

The recent Bitcoin rally is seen as a speculative short squeeze, amplified by positive news flow from Washington D.C. In a market untethered from fundamentals, Bitcoin's unique identity as both a risk-on asset and a safe haven makes it an attractive haven from macro craziness. Its price action is notoriously concentrated in short, explosive bursts, suggesting a "buy and hold" strategy is more practical than attempting to time the market.

The Stablecoin Race: Big Banks Poised to Win?

  • “Weirdly, I think the big banks are going to be winners here in the stablecoin race... who has all the treasury collateral and borrows in repo markets? The answer is the big banks.”
  • The Genius Act, if passed, is set to reshape the financial landscape. It effectively blocks non-financial firms like Meta or Amazon from launching stablecoins while positioning large banks to dominate the space.
  • Big banks hold the key advantages: vast pools of treasury collateral for reserves, massive built-in customer bases for distribution, and the scale to manage the underlying assets.
  • This poses an existential threat to smaller regional banks, who may be "forcibly unbundled" by superior stablecoin payment products unless they cooperate to create their own shared infrastructure, a "Zelle for stablecoins."

ICOs Return: Innovation or Financial Nihilism?

  • “If you believe Pump.fun is the future, crypto will fail and token prices should be way, way lower than they currently are.”
  • “This is a new type of onchain equity issuance that I've been waiting for... the real innovation is in onchain equity issuance.”
  • The massive Pump.fun token sale sparked a debate: is it a sign of a maturing on-chain capital market, or simply "gamified financial nihilism"? One view holds it as an extractive casino systematically strip-mining its community for the benefit of insiders.
  • The optimistic take is that it represents the evolution of ICOs, where real, revenue-generating businesses can engage their communities for capital. However, for this model to succeed long-term, the industry must develop private-market solutions for standardized disclosures to protect investors from insider dumping.

Key Takeaways

  • The crypto landscape is restructuring, with regulatory clarity favoring incumbents and new capital models testing the limits of decentralization.
  • Big Banks Are The Stablecoin Play. Forget fintech disruption; the Genius Act positions traditional banks with massive balance sheets and collateral access as the primary beneficiaries of the stablecoin boom, not Silicon Valley.
  • Bitcoin Miners Are a Leading Indicator. The performance of publicly traded Bitcoin miners often precedes major moves in Bitcoin's price, making them a "canary in the coal mine" for traders seeking an edge.
  • Real-World Assets Demand New Blockchains. The future of tokenized assets won't happen on today's chains. The winners will be platforms like Stellar or Avalanche Subnets that offer validator-level controls for transaction reversal, sacrificing permissionlessness for institutional-grade security.

For further insights, watch the full podcast: Link

This episode unpacks the perfect storm driving Bitcoin's surge, revealing how regulatory shifts in DC could hand stablecoin dominance to big banks and ignite a new, more sophisticated ICO boom.

Guest Introduction: Austin Campbell

  • The episode features guest Austin Campbell, introduced as a "high scholar of zero knowledge consulting."
  • Austin describes himself as a "grouchy fixed income person" with extensive experience in stablecoins and crypto. His perspective is grounded in deep market structure knowledge from his time at firms like JP Morgan, combined with his current role as a college professor and consultant.

Bitcoin's Rally and Macro Forces

  • The discussion kicks off by analyzing the drivers behind Bitcoin's significant price movement, which the hosts frame as a potential move toward $120,000.
  • Rahm Aluwalia posits the rally is a classic short squeeze, a market event where a rapid price increase forces short sellers to buy back the asset to cover their positions, further driving up the price. He points to positive news flow from "Crypto Week" in Washington D.C. and the asset's shift from a low to high volatility regime as key catalysts.
  • Noel Acheson offers a broader macro perspective, arguing the rally is less about fundamentals and more about "craziness" in the global markets. She views Bitcoin as a temporary safe haven from stretched equity valuations and geopolitical uncertainty, noting its unique position as a global asset unaffected by earnings seasons or most political whims.
  • "Right now, Bitcoin does look like a safe haven in a fairly crazy market. It is still a risk asset though. Will always continue to trade as such." - Noel Acheson
  • Austin Campbell provides a multi-angled analysis, suggesting the market is misinterpreting short-term signals like CPI data, which he notes is less reliable due to government staffing shortages. He advises investors to look at Bitcoin's price in multiple currencies (e.g., Euro) and relative to other assets like gold to get a clearer picture. He emphasizes that for a high positive skew asset like Bitcoin—one that delivers most of its gains in a few explosive days—the most effective strategy for many is simply to "buy it and forget about it."

Bitcoin-Adjacent Investment Opportunities

  • The conversation shifts to related investment opportunities, particularly Bitcoin miners.
  • Steve Ehrlich notes that miners have often struggled compared to companies holding Bitcoin directly, facing challenging economics due to capital intensity and the halving's impact on revenue.
  • Rahm counters that miners can be a leading indicator for Bitcoin's price, calling them a "canary in the coal mine." He highlights innovation in the space, such as off-grid mining using stranded natural gas, but reiterates that miners, like Bitcoin itself, are assets "meant to be traded, not hodled."
  • The discussion also touches on miners pivoting to other areas, with Bit Digital's move toward Solana mentioned as a notable example of this trend.

Crypto Week in DC: The Future of Stablecoin Regulation

  • Austin Campbell provides a detailed breakdown of the three crypto-related bills being discussed in the U.S. Congress: the GIS Act (referred to as the "Genius Act" in the discussion), the Clarity Act, and the anti-CBDC bill.
  • He gives the GIS Act the highest probability of passing, viewing it as the most mature and well-understood piece of legislation. He believes the Clarity Act faces significant hurdles, and the anti-CBDC bill is too poorly defined to advance.
  • Strategic Implications of the GIS Act:
    • Big Tech Losers: The act would prohibit non-financial companies like Meta or Amazon from issuing stablecoins without extraordinary Treasury approval, effectively walling them off from the financial system.
    • Small Bank Losers: Austin argues that market forces, accelerated by stablecoins, will "forcibly unbundle" the services of small banks, which cannot compete on payments or risk management with larger institutions.
    • Big Bank Winners: Large banks are positioned to win by managing stablecoin reserve assets, trading the underlying bonds, and launching their own stablecoins to a built-in customer base. They also dominate the reverse repo market (a form of overnight lending against Treasuries), a primary use for stablecoin reserves.
    • Global Consumer Winners: The act would expand access to U.S. dollars for individuals globally, offering a way to bypass unstable local currencies and gain financial stability.

The Bank Stablecoin Dilemma and the Future of Payments

  • The panel debates how banks will navigate the stablecoin landscape and whether they can truly compete with crypto-native issuers like Circle or Tether.
  • A key challenge identified is the lack of fungibility—the ability to interchange one asset for another of the same type. While a user may not want five different bank-issued stablecoins, Austin suggests a solution is possible. He proposes a model where banks could create a mutually acceptable stablecoin backed by a standardized pool of Treasury collateral, making them effectively interchangeable.
  • The conversation distinguishes between stablecoins and deposit tokens, which are digital representations of a deposit on a specific bank's balance sheet (like JPM Coin). Austin clarifies that deposit tokens are inherently not fungible, as a deposit at one bank is not equal to a deposit at another, especially during times of stress.
  • Actionable Insight: The evolution of bank-issued stablecoins is a critical trend. Investors should watch for the development of interoperability standards and collaborative efforts like a "Zelle for stablecoins," which could determine whether regional banks survive or are crushed by giants like JP Morgan.

Global Impact: Dollarization and Capital Controls

  • Noel Acheson details the global reaction to the rise of dollar-backed stablecoins, explaining that central banks worldwide are "freaking out."
  • In Europe, fear of dollarization is a primary driver behind the push for a Digital Euro. Noel explains that policymakers are framing it as a convenience, but the underlying motive is to maintain monetary control and move citizens off U.S. payment rails like Visa and Mastercard.
  • "We need to be able to rely on a payment system that is always available across the euro area and the reading between the lines what they're basically hinting is that we want everyone in Europe off of the American systems." - Noel Acheson
  • This trend extends to emerging markets like Nigeria, where governments blame crypto for currency devaluation and are implementing capital controls—government measures to limit the flow of capital out of the country. Stablecoins represent a direct threat to these controls.

The Pump.fun ICO and a New Era of Capital Formation

  • The discussion turns to the recent Initial Coin Offering (ICO)—a method of raising capital by selling a new cryptocurrency—for Pump.fun, a platform on the Solana blockchain for launching memecoins. The project raised hundreds of millions of dollars in minutes.
  • Rahm connects the phenomenon to the strong performance of meme stocks in traditional markets, but suggests the "memecoin season is going to soften."
  • Austin offers a cynical take, describing Pump.fun as "peak gamified financial nihilism" and viewing the token sale as the founders capitalizing on a potentially unsustainable, casino-like business model.
  • Noel sees a bigger trend: the start of a new, more mature ICO season. Unlike the 2017 bubble, this involves real, revenue-generating businesses using tokens for on-chain equity issuance. This represents a powerful new model for capital formation.
  • Actionable Insight: The Pump.fun event signals a potential resurgence of ICOs, but with a new focus on profitable on-chain businesses. Researchers and investors should monitor the development of standardized disclosures for these offerings, as their absence remains a major risk and barrier to institutional adoption.

Grayscale's IPO and the Future of Public Crypto Companies

  • The panel analyzes Grayscale's confidential filing for an IPO.
  • Rahm is skeptical, pointing out that Grayscale's assets under management (AUM) are below their 2021 peak, they face intense fee competition from new ETF issuers like BlackRock, and their business is heavily concentrated in a single product (GBTC).
  • Austin argues that alternative asset managers like Grayscale are often better run as private companies, as public markets punish them during the inevitable crypto boom-bust cycles. He predicts a potential scenario where Grayscale's stock pops on hype before tanking, making it a cheap acquisition target for a larger, diversified financial firm.
  • The core challenge for Grayscale is articulating a compelling growth story beyond its legacy products, especially after enabling the very competition that is now eroding its market share.

Final Thoughts and Contrarian Takes

  • Noel Acheson: Reiterates that current macro data is largely "theater" and irrelevant amid profound market uncertainty.
  • Austin Campbell: Delivers a contrarian view on blockchain infrastructure, arguing that for real-world assets, the winning platforms will not be today's popular public blockchains. He states that networks like Stellar or Avalanche Subnets, which allow for validator-level controls and error reversal, are better suited for tokenized assets that must comply with rule of law.
  • "The Bitcoin style of permissionlessness does not work for real world assets." - Austin Campbell
  • Rahm Aluwalia: Predicts a market rotation away from high-momentum assets and into categories like energy, commodities, and international banks. He also expresses optimism for small-cap stocks.
  • Steve Ehrlich: Concludes by expressing support for Bitcoin miners, highlighting their crucial role in securing the network while operating in an "incredibly tough environment" with adversarial economics.

This episode reveals a market at a crossroads, where US regulation could crown big banks as stablecoin kings and legitimize ICOs as a capital market. Investors must track legislative progress and the shift from speculative memecoins to on-chain equity issuance to identify the next wave of infrastructure winners.

Others You May Like