Empire
June 27, 2025

Bell Curve X Empire | Prediction Markets, Crypto’s Mag 7 & Stablecoin Growth | Weekly Roundup

In this weekly roundup, the minds behind the Bell Curve and Empire podcasts tackle crypto's evolving landscape, from the strategic showdown in prediction markets to the urgent need for tokens to develop real business models and the tidal wave of capital stablecoins are set to unleash.

The Prediction Market Showdown

  • "If you look at Bloomberg... or any of the news publications, they're actually quoting Poly Market and Poly Market odds for certain situations, whereas they're not doing that with Kalshi. It is not just a business model and a tech difference, but a branding difference."
  • "It's probably, in my opinion, the breakaway consumer app in crypto... most normie users don't care about [the underlying tech]. They just want to know, 'can I use Apple Pay?'"
  • Divergent Strategies: The prediction market space is dominated by two players with opposite approaches. Poly Market is winning the brand and mindshare war with a direct-to-consumer focus, becoming the go-to source for odds cited by mainstream media. Kalshi is playing the long game, building a regulated, licensed infrastructure hub designed to power partners like Robinhood, mirroring Coinbase's early, slower-but-steadier path.
  • Distribution is King: While Kalshi’s regulated approach provides a moat, the panel leans towards owning the user relationship. They argue that the ultimate winner might be a future player with even greater distribution, capable of solving the persistent problem of low liquidity in niche markets.

Crypto's "Mag 7" & The Value Dilemma

  • "The meta narrative that is forming is... tokens need to make money. Tokens need to have a business model. There needs to be a value accrual to the token just in the same way that there is to Robin Hood and Coinbase."
  • "Where does value accrue: the token or the equity? I actually think we're at this line in the sand moment where the industry is saying you got to pick one... If you choose both, you inherently disadvantage one of them."
  • Flight to Quality: The prevailing investment thesis is shifting from pure narrative to tangible fundamentals. A "Magnificent Seven" of crypto will emerge, defined by protocols that generate real revenue and have clear business models, such as memecoin launchpad Pump.fun, which is earning over $1 million per day.
  • Pick a Lane: A critical tension point for projects is deciding where value should accrue—to the company's equity (e.g., Uniswap Labs) or to the protocol's token (e.g., UNI). Trying to serve both masters creates investor confusion and ultimately disadvantages one vehicle, forcing a choice to attract serious capital.

The Stablecoin & Institutional Wave

  • "I don't think the four-year cycle exists anymore... the institutionalization, the ETFs, the productization of all of these... it's basically like a global T-WAP that lasts years."
  • Capital is Coming: Bessemer's forecast of a $3.7 trillion stablecoin market is a game-changer. This flood of on-chain capital will seek yield, creating a massive tailwind for protocols that can offer sustainable returns, like Maker (rebranding to Spark) and Maple (rebranding to Syrup). These assets are currently trading at a fraction of the valuation of their TradFi-adjacent peers like Circle, presenting a potential re-rating opportunity.
  • Breaking the Cycle: The traditional VC model is strained, with over 60% of US endowment venture portfolios being cash-flow negative over the last five years. As institutional capital enters crypto through accessible wrappers like ETFs and public stocks (which trade at a premium), it will likely break the classic four-year, halving-driven market cycle, leading to a more prolonged, multi-year influx of global liquidity.

Key Takeaways

  • Demand Cash Flow: The next crypto "Mag 7" will be defined by protocols with real, on-chain revenue and clear business models, not just speculative narratives.
  • Bet on Yield: The predicted $3.7 trillion influx into stablecoins will disproportionately benefit yield-generating protocols, offering a prime opportunity as they re-rate to reflect their cash-generating power.
  • The 4-Year Cycle is Dead: Forget the halving. Institutional capital entering via ETFs and public equities is transforming crypto into a multi-year bull market, fueled by a slow, steady global "T-WAP" of capital.

For further insights and detailed discussions, watch the full podcast: Link

Here are the detailed, narrative-driven show notes for Crypto AI investors and researchers, based on the provided podcast transcript.

Prediction Markets: The Race for Dominance

  • Poly Market is positioned as a crypto-native, direct-to-consumer brand that has successfully captured mindshare and media attention, often being cited as a source for odds on major geopolitical and political events.
  • Kalshi has taken a regulated, infrastructure-focused approach, securing a CFTC license and partnering with platforms like Robinhood to provide liquidity, even if it means sacrificing direct brand recognition.
  • Santiago notes that the success of modern prediction markets is a lesson in timing, as earlier attempts like Augur—an early prediction market platform on Ethereum—failed primarily due to the lack of stablecoins for reliable settlement.
  • Michael Arrington emphasizes the power of brand recognition in this race, sharing a personal anecdote: “his wife came home and it's like, well, what are the polymarket odds? It's not what's the Kalshi odds and I think that that's something else to note.”

Strategic Implication: The Poly Market vs. Kalshi dynamic mirrors the early crypto exchange wars (e.g., the regulated path of Coinbase vs. the growth-at-all-costs path of Binance). Investors should analyze which model—brand-led distribution or regulated infrastructure—is better positioned for long-term value capture in the US market.

The Search for Crypto's "Magnificent Seven"

  • Michael argues that for a crypto asset to join this elite group, it must have a sustainable business model and a clear mechanism for value accrual. He stresses the need for standardized financial reporting, similar to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), to allow for apples-to-apples comparisons of token performance.
  • He suggests that protocols generating significant, on-chain revenue, such as the rumored model for Pump.fun, are the primary candidates for this future index of top-tier crypto assets.

Actionable Insight: The era of pure narrative investing is fading. Crypto investors and researchers must now prioritize fundamental analysis, focusing on protocols with transparent revenue generation, defensible business models, and clear token value accrual.

The Overlooked Power of Exchange Tokens

  • The panel deconstructs the success of BNB's token model. Beyond simple fee discounts, BNB holders on Binance receive airdrops of newly listed tokens, which they can immediately sell.
  • Michael quantifies this, stating this mechanism has generated an effective APY of 50-100% for stakers, creating a powerful and self-reinforcing demand flywheel for the token.

Strategic Implication: The BNB model serves as a powerful case study in successful tokenomics that directly rewards holders with tangible value. Researchers should analyze such non-US-centric models to identify under-the-radar strategies for value accrual that could be replicated elsewhere.

The Great Divide: Token vs. Equity Value Accrual

  • Jason uses Uniswap and its development arm, Uniswap Labs, as a prime example of this dilemma. It remains unclear whether the ultimate goal is to drive value to the UNI token or to pursue an IPO for the lab entity.
  • Michael asserts that attempting to serve both masters is a losing strategy, as it inherently disadvantages one side and dilutes the investment thesis for both token holders and equity investors. “I actually think we're at this like line in the sand moment where the industry is saying you got to pick one right,” Jason states, capturing the urgency of the issue.

Actionable Insight: For investors, demanding clarity on a project's primary value accrual target (token or equity) is now a critical piece of due diligence. A project's indecisiveness on this front should be considered a significant risk factor.

Public Equities as the New Crypto On-Ramp

  • Santiago explains that many institutional funds are prohibited from holding on-chain assets directly due to regulatory or internal risk mandates. For them, buying stocks like Coinbase is the only way to express a long-crypto thesis.
  • Michael adds that this separation of capital pools is a major market inefficiency. He notes that potential market structure legislation, like the Clarity Act, could bridge this gap, but until then, public equities will remain the preferred vehicle for institutional crypto exposure.

Strategic Implication: The high valuations of public crypto companies reflect massive, latent institutional demand. Investors should anticipate this trend continuing as more crypto-native companies (e.g., Chainalysis) pursue IPOs, creating more regulated on-ramps for traditional capital.

Tokenizing Private Markets: A New Capital Frontier

  • Santiago frames this as a way to unlock "trapped pools of capital" from international investors who cannot normally access the U.S. private markets.
  • This innovation, however, creates a new competitor for capital that has historically flowed into native crypto assets like L1s and memecoins. Now, on-chain investors can get exposure to premier tech growth assets.
  • The speakers acknowledge the regulatory complexities, noting that any offering of tokenized equity would still need to solve for KYC and comply with securities laws.

Strategic Implication: The rise of tokenized RWAs, especially private equity, will force crypto-native assets to compete more directly with traditional growth investments. Researchers should model how these new on-chain options could shift capital flows away from speculative crypto assets.

The Institutional Squeeze: Venture Capital Under Strain

  • He introduces the Denominator Effect: a situation where a decline in public market portfolios causes an institution's allocation to illiquid private assets (like venture capital) to exceed its target, forcing a halt in new commitments.
  • He shares a stark statistic from an endowment manager: “60 plus% of the venture portfolios at US endowments are cash flow negative over the last 5 years.”
  • This illiquidity crisis means that endowments and pensions are pulling back from venture, which will lead to smaller crypto venture funds and a tighter fundraising environment for startups.

Actionable Insight: Crypto founders should prepare for a more challenging fundraising climate with smaller round sizes. For investors, this could mean fewer new projects coming to market, but potentially a higher quality bar for those that do secure funding.

Market Cycles, Bitcoin Dominance, and Regulatory Tailwinds

  • Santiago argues that rising Bitcoin dominance is a normal, cyclical phenomenon where wealth created in Bitcoin eventually flows "down the risk curve" into altcoins.
  • However, he emphasizes a key difference in this cycle: the unprecedented regulatory clarity emerging in the U.S. This policy shift is a massive potential tailwind for L1s and other crypto protocols that have been suppressed by regulatory uncertainty.

Strategic Implication: While L1s and other altcoins are currently underperforming, the improving regulatory landscape in the U.S. could be the catalyst that reignites the "catch-up trade." Investors should monitor policy developments closely as a leading indicator for a potential altcoin season.

Crypto-Enabled Businesses and the Value of Verifiability

  • Santiago uses DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) like Helium and Hivemapper as examples. These networks use crypto incentives to build real-world infrastructure (telecom, mapping data) at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods.
  • This raises a critical investment question: in this model, where does the value accrue? Does it go to the network's token (e.g., HNT) or to the stock of the traditional company (e.g., a telco) that saves millions by using the decentralized infrastructure?
  • Santi concludes he is not certain the token will outperform the equity of the business that adopts the technology.

Actionable Insight: The investment thesis for some crypto protocols is shifting from "decentralization" to "verifiable efficiency." Researchers and investors must analyze the entire value chain to determine whether the protocol's token or the equity of its enterprise users is the primary beneficiary.

The Ripple Effects of a Multi-Trillion Dollar Stablecoin Market

  • Michael breaks the market into two categories: payment stablecoins (like USDC and USDT) used for transactions, and yield-bearing stablecoins (like Ethena's USDe and Maple's SYRUP USD) used for asset allocation and generating returns.
  • He argues that the primary beneficiaries of this tidal wave of liquidity will be protocols that can generate sustainable, real yield. As trillions of dollars seek a home on-chain, these yield-generating platforms are positioned to see their revenues and TVL multiply.

Strategic Implication: Protocols that offer real, sustainable yield are the most direct way to play the explosive growth of the stablecoin market. Investors should focus on platforms with proven models for generating revenue from on-chain economic activity.

The Valuation Gap Between DeFi and Public Markets

  • Santiago poses the question: Why does a protocol like Maker (now Sky) trade at a fraction of the valuation of Circle, despite having a powerful, capital-efficient business model?
  • Michael attributes this to a market lag caused by complex and slow-moving protocol transitions and rebrands. He points to Maple Finance's transition from MPL to SYRUP, after which the token re-rated 4-5x, as a potential roadmap for how Sky could be re-valued once its own transition is complete.

Actionable Insight: A significant arbitrage opportunity may exist in established DeFi protocols undergoing complex but value-accretive upgrades. The market is often slow to price in these transitions, creating a window for savvy investors who do the deep diligence to get in ahead of the re-rating.

Conclusion

The discussion reveals a market at a crossroads, where crypto-native assets now compete with tokenized equities and public stocks. Investors and researchers must pivot from narrative to fundamental analysis, scrutinizing revenue models and value accrual mechanisms to identify sustainable investments in this new, integrated financial landscape.

Others You May Like