Epoch AI
October 27, 2025

AI can learn logic. But can it learn folklore knowledge? - Svetlana Jitomirskaya

Svetlana Jitomirskaya, a mathematical physicist at UC Berkeley, explores the evolving capabilities of AI in mathematics. She unpacks its surprising grasp of logic, its current limitations in accessing unwritten “folklore” knowledge, and how it's set to reshape the very nature of mathematical research.

The Folklore Knowledge Frontier

  • "In order to solve my problem, the machine would really need to argue in a way that is not even written in any paper, although maybe understood by some people in the field."
  • "It is not a very difficult problem for someone who has certain knowledge, but this knowledge is not widespread. This knowledge is not in the literature. This is kind of a little bit of a folklore knowledge."

Jitomirskaya submitted a problem to an AI challenge that hinges on this concept. While a knowledgeable graduate student could solve it, the problem is designed to stump AI because its solution requires unwritten, expert intuition that isn’t present in existing literature or training data. She predicts her problem will withstand AI for another 10-20 years, highlighting the current gap between data-driven logic and specialized human understanding.

From Routine to Pure Creativity

  • "The work of mathematicians will become more creative; there will be less time spent on routine because this can be delegated to the machines."
  • "I always thought that they were just regurgitating, but they developed logic right now... It's very hard for me to imagine how AI would try something that nobody has tried, and that's creativity."

AI is already proving its worth by automating lengthy computations and logical arguments, tasks Jitomirskaya admits she was “lazy” to do herself. This frees up human intellect to focus on the truly hard parts. While she was once skeptical, she now sees that language models have developed an emergent capacity for logic. The final frontier, however, remains true creativity—the ability to generate a completely novel approach, which she believes is still a uniquely human domain.

The Future of Proofs and the Profession

  • "My biggest hope... is that all mathematics will be put in a verified database... and when you submit a paper to a journal, you need to prove that it was Lean verified."
  • "People keep playing chess, for example. So math may become something like sports."

The most profound near-term impact of AI on mathematics will likely be automated proof verification. Jitomirskaya envisions a future where tools like the Lean theorem prover automatically check papers for correctness, revolutionizing peer review. On a longer timescale, if AI eventually masters creative math, the human pursuit of it may transform into something like a sport—practiced for the intellectual joy and challenge, not just for discovering novel results.

Key Takeaways

  • AI is a powerful tool for automating logical grunt work in math, but the frontier lies in teaching it the unwritten, intuitive "folklore knowledge" and true creativity. The field is headed toward a future of automated verification and a greater emphasis on human ingenuity.
  • The "Folklore" Bottleneck: AI's primary limitation isn't complex logic but its inability to access uncodified, expert intuition—the "folklore" that guides human problem-solving.
  • Automation Breeds Creativity: As AI handles routine calculations and arguments, the value of human mathematicians will shift entirely to creative and abstract thinking, raising the bar for what constitutes a meaningful contribution.
  • Proof Verification Is the Next Revolution: The most immediate and profound change in mathematics will be AI-driven, formally verified proofs, which will guarantee correctness and reshape the entire publishing and peer-review landscape.

For further insights and discussions, watch the full podcast: Link

This episode explores the collision of AI and advanced mathematics, questioning whether AI can grasp the unwritten "folklore knowledge" that drives human creativity and what this means for the future of research.

Introduction to a Mathematician's Perspective

  • The episode features Svetlana Jitomirskaya, a UC Berkeley professor specializing in mathematical physics and spectral theory—a field studying operators and their properties, often applied in physics.
  • Jitomirskaya expresses a mix of fascination and concern about AI's role in mathematics, attending the event to understand its latest capabilities and potential to “put us out of work.” Her perspective is that of a seasoned expert grappling with a technology that is rapidly encroaching on her field.

The "Folklore Knowledge" Challenge

  • Jitomirskaya submitted a problem for an AI challenge that hinges on the interplay between number theory and spectral theory, specifically involving effects at very large scales.
  • The problem's difficulty for an AI lies not in its computational complexity but in its reliance on what she calls "folklore knowledge"—specialized, unwritten knowledge and intuition shared among experts in a niche field.
  • She notes that a knowledgeable graduate student could solve it, but the required insights are not documented in literature, making it a test of reasoning beyond existing text.
  • "This knowledge is not in the literature. This is kind of a little bit of a folklore knowledge."

AI's Evolving Capabilities: From Regurgitation to Logic

  • Jitomirskaya admits to being surprised by the recent advancements in AI. After testing easier versions of her problem where the AI "had no clue," she witnessed a model perform lengthy computations and arguments "momentarily" to help her formulate a new problem.
  • This experience shifted her view. She previously believed large language models were merely "regurgitating" information but now acknowledges they have developed a form of logic, likely by learning to extrapolate key ideas from summarizing vast amounts of text.
  • Strategic Implication: The rapid evolution from pattern matching to logical reasoning suggests that AI's capabilities in abstract fields are accelerating faster than many experts anticipated. Investors should note that models are moving beyond data retrieval into genuine problem-solving.

The Future of Mathematical Research and Creativity

  • Jitomirskaya predicts AI will fundamentally change the work of mathematicians, leading to a smaller, more creative field.
  • Routine tasks, such as proving theorems by analogy to existing papers, will likely be automated. This will free up researchers to focus on more innovative and abstract thinking.
  • However, she remains skeptical about AI's ability to replicate true human creativity—the capacity to try something entirely new. She questions how a machine can be trained to develop abstract thinking from just a few examples, a hallmark of human intuition.

Formal Verification and the Future of Proofs

  • Jitomirskaya’s biggest hope is for AI to advance formal proof verification systems like Lean, a software tool that allows mathematicians to write proofs that can be automatically checked for correctness by a computer.
  • She envisions a future where all mathematical papers are submitted with a Lean-verified proof, eliminating errors and shifting the role of peer reviewers from verifying correctness to judging a paper's significance.
  • The current bottleneck is the time-intensive process of translating human-written proofs into Lean's format. She highlights that an automatic translator, which some experts believe is only a few years away, would be a revolutionary development.
  • Actionable Insight: The development of an automatic translator for formal verification systems like Lean represents a major opportunity. Crypto AI investors should monitor progress in this area, as it could create a new standard for rigor in both academic and commercial research.

AI-Generated Proofs and the Nature of Math

  • The conversation touches on a philosophical question: If an AI proved a major unsolved problem like the Riemann Hypothesis—a famous conjecture about the distribution of prime numbers—but the proof was too complex for any human to understand, would it still be valuable mathematics?
  • Jitomirskaya likens this scenario to existing computer-assisted proofs, which are accepted by the community despite being unverifiable by a single human. While valuable, she notes such proofs lack the elegance and insight of a "proof from the book" that conveys mathematical beauty.

Guidance for the Next Generation

  • For new math students, Jitomirskaya advises learning the fundamentals "the old-fashioned way" while using AI as a powerful tool, similar to how previous generations used computers for experiments.
  • Her core message is to treat AI as a "friend and helper" to augment human intellect, not as a replacement for foundational understanding.

Predictions on AI's Impact

  • On solving her problem: She predicts it will take more than 10, maybe 20 years.
  • On changing math research (0-10 scale): A 5, indicating a significant but not total transformation.
  • On changing the world (0-10 scale): "Even more" than a 10 (the Industrial Revolution), highlighting her belief in its profound societal impact.
  • On her personal outlook (0-10 scale): An 8, reflecting a strong sense of optimism in progress, provided safeguards are in place.

Conclusion: The Enduring Value of Human Formulation

  • The episode concludes that AI's next frontier is not just solving problems but mastering the unwritten "folklore knowledge" defining human expertise. For investors and researchers, the key takeaway is to focus on tools that bridge human intuition and machine logic, particularly in automated formal verification, to unlock the next wave of innovation.

Others You May Like